As the Supreme Court could be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be achieved, therefore the decision in the Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) from the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
A guide to online and print sources of Washington State court opinions, rules, forms, and jury instructions
fourteen. In the light of the position explained over, it's concluded that a civil servant includes a fundamental right to be promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but could not be considered for no fault of his personal and In the meantime he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency from the length of service or inside the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 433 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
This ruling has conditions, and Considering that the petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying Examination, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based within the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances with the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 of the Constitution. Read more
13 . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some duration, both parties have agreed towards the disposal of the moment petition on the premise that the DIGP Malir will listen to the petitioner as well as private respondents and will acquire care of each of the components of the case and guarantee that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
Civil Courts retain jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it necessitates legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be generated and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
When the state court hearing the case reviews the law, he finds that, even though it mentions large multi-tenant properties in certain context, it truly is actually quite imprecise about whether the ninety-day provision applies to all landlords. The judge, based on the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held to your ninety-day notice necessity, and rules in Stacy’s favor.
Because of this, basically citing the case is more likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Think about it as calling an individual to tell them you’ve found their misplaced phone, then telling them you live in this sort of-and-this sort of neighborhood, without actually providing them an address. Driving throughout the neighborhood looking check here to find their phone is likely to be more frustrating than it’s really worth.
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is perfectly-settled that though thinking of the case of standard promotion of civil servants, the competent authority must take into account the merit of all of the eligible candidates and after due deliberations, to grant promotion to these qualified candidates who're found to become most meritorious amongst them. Since the petitioner was held for being senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was dismissed by the respondent department just to increase favor for the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy around the part in the respondent department.
The regulation of necessity identified and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it absolutely was the illegal action called legislation of necessity..
Under Article 199, the court possesses the authority to review government policies for reasonableness if applicable in respondent university also to safeguard aggrieved parties' rights. As a result, this petition is admissible based on founded court precedents, along with the respondents' objections are overruled. Read more
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability within the matter, but couldn't be answerable in almost any way for their actions. When the court delayed making such a ruling, the defendants took their request to the appellate court.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy in the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to to the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can create inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” are certainly not binding, but may be used as persuasive authority, which is to give substance towards the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.